16-09-2019, 10:28 AM
Homem Honrado do Mês de Setembro - 2019
Vamos à nonaa votação mensal para os Homens Honrados de 2019. A cada mês, até novembro será eleito um HH, que no final concorrerá com os demais para o título de HH de 2019, na votação a ser realizada em dezembro/19. Qualquer usuário com patente de soldado ou superior poderá organizar os tópicos, com liberdade para escolher os candidatos, abrir o tópico a indicações de candidatos, ou criar temas para as votações caso seja de seu interesse. Caso dois ou mais usuários manifestem interesse em criar um tópico, os usuários com maior reputação e patente terão prioridade.
As indicações ficarão abertas até o dia 22/09, e a votação ocorrerá de 23 a 30/09.
O Vencedor de 2018 foram os Pracinhas da FEB. Vejam o tópico criado pelo Fernando_R1 para mais detalhes de sua história.
O vencedor de fevereiro de 2019 foi Jair Messias Bolsonaro.
O vencedor de março de 2019 foi Bruce Lee.
O vencedor de abril de 2019 foi Tommy Robinson.
O vencedor de maio de 2019 foi Miyamoto Musashi.
O vencedor de junho de 2019 foi Nessahan Alita.
O vencedor de julho de 2019 foi Alberto Santos Dumont.
O vencedor de agosto de 2019 foi Carlos Martel.
Este mês teremos como tema homens que valorizaram e exaltaram as virtudes familiares
Eu de cara vou indicar Daniel Amneus, autor dos livros The Garbage Generation, sobre a geração de filhos de pais e mães solteiros e como esta geração é gravemente prejudicada por esse arranjo (li e recomendo tal livro), The Case for Father Custody, sobre quem deve ter a guarda dos filhos numa separação, e Back to Patriarchy, título autoexplicativo.
Como existe muito pouco material sobre o homem em si, vou deixar um texto em inglês mesmo com mais detalhes sobre ele
January 8, 2004
I am quiescent and circumspect. Sad and reposed.
(T)he honorable Dr. Daniel Amneus passed away on December 18 th, 2003. Like a somber mid-December storm, a great passing has occurred in this nation; quietly, and without fanfare. Like a dark rain, something important has passed us all, in profound silence. But that passing has meant something. I hope to put the words here to show who and what this man was, and what he had accomplished.
Most Father’s Rights advocates have no idea whom Dr. Amneus was. They have no idea of his foundational contributions to the movement. They have not read his most compelling works. Yet they must. The modern contemporary men’s movement and its achievements of the last decade, can be directly traced to him. He was not the first Father’s Rights advocate, but certainly he was the most concise and eloquent of our forefathers who wrote about father’s and family rights, (at a time when it was not only not recognized, but openly excoriated). Like Galileo, he saw an immutable truth, and wrote comprehensive text about it—which allowed our modern movement a solid socio-political treatise which indomitably changed the face of fatherhood, and made Father’s Rights marketable and more mainstream. He paid a price for that dedication and truth: his work was mostly ignored.
The man was a great intellect, coming clearly from a classical background and training. His mind was eminently empirical, and he countenanced no less excellence in either his work or his students work. You would have to know the man to understand the intellect. He was a quiet, reserved man, one who tread in a measured pace. He wanted to help others, so he took the tools of his trade — his mind, his teaching and his writing — and applied them to the current problem of modern Fatherhood. The Father’s Rights movement has no idea of the treasure it has lost. A great national treasure has passed from our midst, and there is nothing in recognition. Only silence. We should mark him better; and defend not only his name, but his work.
His first book on Father’s Rights was called “Back to Patriarchy,” printed by Arlington House Publishers in June of 1979. (A)lthough it was good, it had not truly established his voice. It was merely the first gauntlet thrown… His second work was “The Garbage Generation,” [published under his own label of Primrose Press, 1990], … which finally came into his own. This book … defined not only the standards of Fatherlessness, but established the watermark of the modern men’s movement. All Father Advocates owe their work to the Garbage Generation, yet; the future was to arrive in his next book.
Dr. Amneus next book: The Case for Father Custody [Primrose Press 2000] … was a body of work which is the watershed of our movement. Where contemporary men and author’s have written mere expose’s, such as Dr. Warren Farrell’s The Myth of Male Power Penguin USA (2001); and Dr. Wade Horn’sThe Fatherhood Initiative; Jeffery M. Leving’s Father’s Rights: Hard-Hitting & Fair Advice for Every Father Involved in a Custody Dispute [HarperCollins (April 1997)]; as well as Dr. Steven Baskerville’s work; David Blankenhorn’s Fatherless America, etc., it was Amneus who wrote to the breadth of humanity. Where modern writers speak to the illness, Amneus addressed and uncovered the genetic code and model. He gave us the answers, deep within his intrinsic thoughts, his profound insight and empirical and definitive proofs.
He gave us the Fatherhood genome and revealed every code throughout its DNA. Our movement quietly stands on Amneus; most people have no idea of (this). It is not only the men’s movement who (must) appreciate his work, but rather, it is humankind who will (benefit). Like the great classics of our time,The Case for Father Custody, will be a definitive work about Father’s Rights which will stand separate from all others’ lesser works. It is the classic of our time, and we must respect that and pay homage.
Most people (have) not read Amneus. They do not know he even exist ed. However, when they are introduced to his work, the reaction is profound. His work is irrefutable, un-rebuttable. It is the duty of any true Father’s Rights advocate to read Dr. Amneus The Case for Father Custody. We must make new effort to adopt Amneus work into the Lexicon of the modern Father’s Rights movement…
The Father’s Rights movement has lost a great man. We have lost others before him, and continue to lose those who have given so much to our cause. We must recognize these great men, and … more importantly—not forget their words and their work.
Then, we must teach them. It is time to venerate those who came before us, and gave us so much, and left us with the treasure it is up to us to carry forwards.
…It is time we acknowledge those like Dr. Daniel Amneus—and make them monuments to be remembered and admired. For they have set our compass and our future.
Citação:Essa seleção é importante por promover comportamentos masculinos honrados, exaltando a figura de homens de valor, que atualmente é esquecida de propósito pela mídia, que só pensa em exaltar a figura feminina e demonizar a masculina. Então iremos resgatar e exaltar a figura masculina como algo de valor e honrado! - Libertador
Vamos à nonaa votação mensal para os Homens Honrados de 2019. A cada mês, até novembro será eleito um HH, que no final concorrerá com os demais para o título de HH de 2019, na votação a ser realizada em dezembro/19. Qualquer usuário com patente de soldado ou superior poderá organizar os tópicos, com liberdade para escolher os candidatos, abrir o tópico a indicações de candidatos, ou criar temas para as votações caso seja de seu interesse. Caso dois ou mais usuários manifestem interesse em criar um tópico, os usuários com maior reputação e patente terão prioridade.
As indicações ficarão abertas até o dia 22/09, e a votação ocorrerá de 23 a 30/09.
O Vencedor de 2018 foram os Pracinhas da FEB. Vejam o tópico criado pelo Fernando_R1 para mais detalhes de sua história.
O vencedor de fevereiro de 2019 foi Jair Messias Bolsonaro.
O vencedor de março de 2019 foi Bruce Lee.
O vencedor de abril de 2019 foi Tommy Robinson.
O vencedor de maio de 2019 foi Miyamoto Musashi.
O vencedor de junho de 2019 foi Nessahan Alita.
O vencedor de julho de 2019 foi Alberto Santos Dumont.
O vencedor de agosto de 2019 foi Carlos Martel.
Este mês teremos como tema homens que valorizaram e exaltaram as virtudes familiares
Eu de cara vou indicar Daniel Amneus, autor dos livros The Garbage Generation, sobre a geração de filhos de pais e mães solteiros e como esta geração é gravemente prejudicada por esse arranjo (li e recomendo tal livro), The Case for Father Custody, sobre quem deve ter a guarda dos filhos numa separação, e Back to Patriarchy, título autoexplicativo.
Como existe muito pouco material sobre o homem em si, vou deixar um texto em inglês mesmo com mais detalhes sobre ele
Citação:
By : Robert Lindsay Cheney Jr.
January 8, 2004
I am quiescent and circumspect. Sad and reposed.
(T)he honorable Dr. Daniel Amneus passed away on December 18 th, 2003. Like a somber mid-December storm, a great passing has occurred in this nation; quietly, and without fanfare. Like a dark rain, something important has passed us all, in profound silence. But that passing has meant something. I hope to put the words here to show who and what this man was, and what he had accomplished.
Most Father’s Rights advocates have no idea whom Dr. Amneus was. They have no idea of his foundational contributions to the movement. They have not read his most compelling works. Yet they must. The modern contemporary men’s movement and its achievements of the last decade, can be directly traced to him. He was not the first Father’s Rights advocate, but certainly he was the most concise and eloquent of our forefathers who wrote about father’s and family rights, (at a time when it was not only not recognized, but openly excoriated). Like Galileo, he saw an immutable truth, and wrote comprehensive text about it—which allowed our modern movement a solid socio-political treatise which indomitably changed the face of fatherhood, and made Father’s Rights marketable and more mainstream. He paid a price for that dedication and truth: his work was mostly ignored.
The man was a great intellect, coming clearly from a classical background and training. His mind was eminently empirical, and he countenanced no less excellence in either his work or his students work. You would have to know the man to understand the intellect. He was a quiet, reserved man, one who tread in a measured pace. He wanted to help others, so he took the tools of his trade — his mind, his teaching and his writing — and applied them to the current problem of modern Fatherhood. The Father’s Rights movement has no idea of the treasure it has lost. A great national treasure has passed from our midst, and there is nothing in recognition. Only silence. We should mark him better; and defend not only his name, but his work.
His first book on Father’s Rights was called “Back to Patriarchy,” printed by Arlington House Publishers in June of 1979. (A)lthough it was good, it had not truly established his voice. It was merely the first gauntlet thrown… His second work was “The Garbage Generation,” [published under his own label of Primrose Press, 1990], … which finally came into his own. This book … defined not only the standards of Fatherlessness, but established the watermark of the modern men’s movement. All Father Advocates owe their work to the Garbage Generation, yet; the future was to arrive in his next book.
Dr. Amneus next book: The Case for Father Custody [Primrose Press 2000] … was a body of work which is the watershed of our movement. Where contemporary men and author’s have written mere expose’s, such as Dr. Warren Farrell’s The Myth of Male Power Penguin USA (2001); and Dr. Wade Horn’sThe Fatherhood Initiative; Jeffery M. Leving’s Father’s Rights: Hard-Hitting & Fair Advice for Every Father Involved in a Custody Dispute [HarperCollins (April 1997)]; as well as Dr. Steven Baskerville’s work; David Blankenhorn’s Fatherless America, etc., it was Amneus who wrote to the breadth of humanity. Where modern writers speak to the illness, Amneus addressed and uncovered the genetic code and model. He gave us the answers, deep within his intrinsic thoughts, his profound insight and empirical and definitive proofs.
He gave us the Fatherhood genome and revealed every code throughout its DNA. Our movement quietly stands on Amneus; most people have no idea of (this). It is not only the men’s movement who (must) appreciate his work, but rather, it is humankind who will (benefit). Like the great classics of our time,The Case for Father Custody, will be a definitive work about Father’s Rights which will stand separate from all others’ lesser works. It is the classic of our time, and we must respect that and pay homage.
Most people (have) not read Amneus. They do not know he even exist ed. However, when they are introduced to his work, the reaction is profound. His work is irrefutable, un-rebuttable. It is the duty of any true Father’s Rights advocate to read Dr. Amneus The Case for Father Custody. We must make new effort to adopt Amneus work into the Lexicon of the modern Father’s Rights movement…
The Father’s Rights movement has lost a great man. We have lost others before him, and continue to lose those who have given so much to our cause. We must recognize these great men, and … more importantly—not forget their words and their work.
Then, we must teach them. It is time to venerate those who came before us, and gave us so much, and left us with the treasure it is up to us to carry forwards.
…It is time we acknowledge those like Dr. Daniel Amneus—and make them monuments to be remembered and admired. For they have set our compass and our future.
- Sem a visão de um objetivo um homem não pode gerir a sua própria vida, e muito menos a vida dos outros.